By AIA Contract Documents
November 18, 2022
In construction contracts, there are clear milestones for completion. One of the most critical is substantial completion, which marks the point when the project is sufficiently finished for the owner to occupy or use the work. Substantial completion triggers key events, such as:
Substantial completion is usually certified by the project architect after a detailed inspection, making it a significant milestone in construction projects.
Once substantial completion is reached, contractors move toward final completion, which means the project is entirely finished, and the contractor receives full payment and releases their lien rights on the property.
However, this two-step process doesn’t work well for maintenance contracts, which don’t include such milestones. Maintenance work, by nature, involves smaller tasks with flexible completion points, making the rigid structure of a construction contract unsuitable.
Maintenance contracts are generally more straightforward than construction contracts. AIA Document F201-2023, titled Work Order for As-Needed Maintenance Work, provides a clear example of how these contracts are structured:
In contrast, ongoing maintenance contracts often don’t define a specific completion point. These contracts require regular services performed on a weekly or monthly basis, and their terms typically span a year or longer.
For example, AIA Document F202-2023, titled Work Order for Ongoing Maintenance Work, specifies:
These contracts are flexible, offering ongoing service rather than defining a specific moment of completion.
Given the differences in how these contracts are structured, it’s often impractical to adapt a construction contract for maintenance work. The amount of redaction required to remove the substantial completion provisions makes it cumbersome and inefficient. Additionally, the complexities and risks tied to substantial completion do not align with the ongoing nature of maintenance services.
In summary, using a construction contract to hire a maintenance contractor is not only confusing but also unnecessary. Maintenance contracts have their own set of expectations and timelines, which are better suited to the nature of regular, ongoing work. It’s more effective to use specific maintenance work agreements like AIA Document F201-2023 and F202-2023 for these projects, which provide clear terms and flexibility without the rigid structure of a construction contract.
When managing maintenance contracts, it’s crucial to choose the correct type of agreement to avoid confusion. Construction contracts, with their focus on substantial completion and milestone payments, are not suited for maintenance contractors. Instead, opt for maintenance-specific contracts that provide clarity and flexibility.
AIA Contract Documents has provided this article for general informational purposes only. The information provided is not legal opinion or legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship of any kind. This article is also not intended to provide guidance as to how project parties should interpret their specific contracts or resolve contract disputes, as those decisions will need to be made in consultation with legal counsel, insurance counsel, and other professionals, and based upon a multitude of factors.